[SAC] [OSGeo] #1812: Purchase data4all.org domain

#1812: Purchase data4all.org domain
---------------------------+-------------------
Reporter: jmckenna | Owner: sac@…
     Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+-------------------
- per discussions
(https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2016-October/016812.html),
purchase data4all.org domain (dataforall.org is already parked by someone
external)

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1812&gt;
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/&gt;
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.

#1812: Purchase data4all.org domain
---------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: jmckenna | Owner: sac@…
     Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+--------------------

Comment (by Venkat):

Replying to [ticket:1812 jmckenna]:
> - per discussions
(https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2016-October/016812.html),
purchase data4all.org domain (dataforall.org is already parked by someone
external)

Mike tells me that we already have auto pay set up with PairNIC and SAC
can purchase the data4all.org domain very simply.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1812#comment:1&gt;
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/&gt;
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.

#1812: Purchase data4all.org domain
---------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: Jeff McKenna | Owner: sac@…
     Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+--------------------

Comment (by robe):

Doesn't look like this was ever done. Is there a reason for the holdup?

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1812#comment:2&gt;
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/&gt;
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.

#1812: Purchase data4all.org domain
---------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: Jeff McKenna | Owner: sac@…
     Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+--------------------

Comment (by wildintellect):

No one with access saw the ticket is my guess.

Checking briefly it seems that dataforall.org could easily be confused
with data4all.org as both would be open source related projects,
dataforall.org even references OGC standards. The .com variant is also
squatted. Is there a committee that's making this request? Could we run
the naming by the Marketing? I'm hesitant to push the purchase on this one
without some more backing. As a compromise I could do 1 year without auto-
renewal which is cheap, in the event that we go a different direction.

If we do purchase, where should this point to?

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1812#comment:3&gt;
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/&gt;
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.