[SAC] [OSGeo] #2155: Whitelist

Committees SAC mailing list
1

#2155: Whitelist
---------------------------+-------------------
Reporter: rduivenvoorde | Owner: sac@…
     Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+-------------------
Hi, we moved plugins.qgis.org to a new server.

The website uses ldap for authentication.

We think for this we need a new white-listing for :
195.201.130.197

Is that possible?

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2155&gt;
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/&gt;
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.

2

#2155: Whitelist
---------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: rduivenvoorde | Owner: sac@…
     Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+--------------------

Comment (by strk):

Done, close after confirmation please.
Should old IP 213.133.111.115 be removed from whitelist ?

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2155#comment:1&gt;
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/&gt;
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.

3

#2155: Whitelist
---------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: rduivenvoorde | Owner: sac@…
     Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+--------------------

Comment (by strk):

For the record: old IP whitelist was requested via ticket #1646

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2155#comment:2&gt;
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/&gt;
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.

4

#2155: Whitelist
---------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: rduivenvoorde | Owner: sac@…
     Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+--------------------

Comment (by rduivenvoorde):

@strk sorry, change of plans... We abandoned the (cloud)server with IP:
195.201.130.197
after we found out the old server was actually doing fine....

And plugins.qgis.org went back to it's (old) server 'qgis2' at:
144.76.174.102

So if you prefer 195.201.130.197 (a Hetzner could ip) can be removed from
the whitelist.

Not sure if 213.133.111.115 is related to this ticket?
We have never used that ip for plugins.qgis.org (I think)

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2155#comment:3&gt;
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/&gt;
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.

5

#2155: Whitelist
---------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: rduivenvoorde | Owner: sac@…
     Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+--------------------

Comment (by strk):

195.201.130.197 removed from whitelist

In the whitelist configuration 213.133.111.115 is documented
as being plugin.qgis.org requested per #1646
while 144.76.174.102 is documented as being a
"dedicated QGIS machine, ask Juergen Fischer"

Shall 213.133.111.115 also be removed then ?

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2155#comment:4&gt;
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/&gt;
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.