[SAC] [OSGeo] #2501: OSGeo server as host for foss4g.2016-website

Hi,

We received this request:

···

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Fwd: [OSGeo] #2501: OSGeo server as host for foss4g.2016-website
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:45:09 -0600 (MDT)
From: tylermitchell@shaw.ca tylermitchell@shaw.ca
To: info@osgeo.org info@osgeo.org

hi, I’m not sure why I’m getting these emails, can you assign a different owner for SAC tickets?


From: OSGeo trac_osgeo@osgeo.org
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2020 3:38:55 AM
Cc: sac@lists.osgeo.org sac@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo] #2501: OSGeo server as host for foss4g.2016-website

#2501: OSGeo server as host for foss4g.2016-website
---------------------±-----------------------
Reporter: tadams | Owner: (none)
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Unplanned
Component: General | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------±-----------------------
Changes (by jef):

  • status: assigned => new
  • owner: tmitchell => (none)

Old description:

Up now the webpage for FOSS4G 2016 in Bonn is hosted on a jiffy box of
the local chapter fossgis. the costs are rather high (~16 €/month), so
they recently moved the page to another server. Astrid Emde created a
tocket for chaning the DNS entry, thanks for that so far.

In this, the question came up, whether it would be possible to move the
website in general to OSGeo. FOSSGIS could deliver the whole server-
content (e.g. as tar.gz).
Qustion: Do you see a chance, that this site moves over to OSSGeo?

New description:

Up to now the webpage for FOSS4G 2016 in Bonn is hosted on a jiffy box of
the local chapter fossgis. the costs are rather high (~16 €/month), so
they recently moved the page to another server. Astrid Emde created #2496
to changing the DNS entry, thanks for that so far.

In this, the question came up, whether it would be possible to move the
website in general to OSGeo. FOSSGIS could deliver the whole server-
content (e.g. as tar.gz).
Question: Do you see a chance, that this site moves over to OSGeo?


Ticket URL: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2501#comment:1
OSGeo https://osgeo.org/
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.

Hi SAC, Angelos,

comments inline:

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:03 PM Angelos Tzotsos <gcpp.kalxas@gmail.com> wrote:

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Fwd: [OSGeo] #2501: OSGeo server as host for foss4g.2016-website
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:45:09 -0600 (MDT)
From: tylermitchell@shaw.ca <tylermitchell@shaw.ca>
To: info@osgeo.org <info@osgeo.org>

hi, I’m not sure why I’m getting these emails, can you assign a different owner for SAC tickets?


From: OSGeo <trac_osgeo@osgeo.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2020 3:38:55 AM
Cc: sac@lists.osgeo.org <sac@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo] #2501: OSGeo server as host for foss4g.2016-website

#2501: OSGeo server as host for foss4g.2016-website

The component emails are assigned here:

https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components

I see numerous outdated emails there.

I’d suggest assigning “institutional” addresses (managed on lists.osgeo.org, in /etc/aliases) rather than individuals.

Opinions?

Markus

On 9/2/20 3:09 PM, Markus Neteler wrote:

Hi SAC, Angelos,

comments inline:

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:03 PM Angelos Tzotsos <gcpp.kalxas@gmail.com>
wrote:

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Fwd: [OSGeo] #2501: OSGeo server as host for foss4g.2016-website
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:45:09 -0600 (MDT)
From: tylermitchell@shaw.ca <tylermitchell@shaw.ca>
To: info@osgeo.org <info@osgeo.org>

hi, I'm not sure why I'm getting these emails, can you assign a different

owner for SAC tickets?

________________________________
From: OSGeo <trac_osgeo@osgeo.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2020 3:38:55 AM
Cc: sac@lists.osgeo.org <sac@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo] #2501: OSGeo server as host for foss4g.2016-website

#2501: OSGeo server as host for foss4g.2016-website

The component emails are assigned here:

https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components

NameOwnerDefault
Board <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/Board&gt; warmerdam
DNS <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/DNS&gt;
sac@lists.osgeo.org
Fundraising
<https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/Fundraising&gt; warmerdam
General <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/General&gt;
tmitchell
Geodata <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/Geodata&gt; zool
Gitea <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/Gitea&gt; strk
Graphics <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/Graphics&gt;
robert
Incubator <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/Incubator&gt;
jive
LiveDVD <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/LiveDVD&gt;
live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
Mailing Lists
<https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/Mailing%20Lists&gt;
cvvergara
Newsletter <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/Newsletter&gt;
tmitchell
OSGeo4W <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/OSGeo4W&gt;
osgeo4w-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Systems Admin
<https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/Systems%20Admin&gt;
sac@lists.osgeo.org
Trac <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/Trac&gt; strk
VisCom <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/VisCom&gt; mpg
WebSite <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/WebSite&gt;
webcom@lists.osgeo.org
Wiki <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components/Wiki&gt;
sac@lists.osgeo.org

I see numerous outdated emails there.

I'd suggest assigning "institutional" addresses (managed on lists.osgeo.org,
in /etc/aliases) rather than individuals.

Opinions?

Markus

Yes, this is a great suggestion.

--
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
President
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:13 PM Angelos Tzotsos <gcpp.kalxas@gmail.com> wrote:

On 9/2/20 3:09 PM, Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:03 PM Angelos Tzotsos <gcpp.kalxas@gmail.com>

...

> The component emails are assigned here:
>
> https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/admin/ticket/components
>

...

> I see numerous outdated emails there.
>
> I'd suggest assigning "institutional" addresses (managed on lists.osgeo.org,
> in /etc/aliases) rather than individuals.
>
> Opinions?
>
> Markus
>

Yes, this is a great suggestion.

ok, here some ideas:

- Board - ? (suggestion: board but there is no alias except for board-priv)
- DNS - sac@lists.osgeo.org
- Fundraising - ? (suggestion: board but there is no alias except
for board-priv)
- General - ? (suggestion: sac@lists.osgeo.org)
- Geodata - ?
- Gitea - ? (suggestion: sac@lists.osgeo.org)
- Graphics - ?
- Incubator - ? (suggestion: incubator@lists.osgeo.org but requires
whitelisting of trac email in mailman)
- LiveDVD - live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
- Mailing Lists - ? (suggestion: sac@lists.osgeo.org)
- Newsletter - ? (since it is historic, suggestion: sac@lists.osgeo.org)
- OSGeo4W - osgeo4w-dev@lists.osgeo.org
- Systems Admin - sac@lists.osgeo.org
- Trac - ? (suggestion: sac@lists.osgeo.org)
- VisCom - ? (suggestion: marketing@lists.osgeo.org but requires
whitelisting of trac email in mailman)
- WebSite - (suggestion: marketing@lists.osgeo.org but requires
whitelisting of trac email in mailman)
- Wiki - sac@lists.osgeo.org

Markus