[SAC] [OSGeo] #2594: vendor-neutral location for schemas

#2594: vendor-neutral location for schemas
---------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: jive | Owner: sac@…
     Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Unplanned
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+-----------------------
Through my participation with geonetwork-opensource I have had an
opportunity to work on a "metadata101" plugin for
[https://github.com/metadata101/iso19139.ca.HNAP iso19139.ca.HNAP] (this
is a Canadian profile of the ISO 19139 North American Profile)

The server hosting this schema is being decommissioned and I am evaluating
options for where it can be hosted in a vendor neutral location. While
metadata101 is vendor neutral, and not directly tied geonetwork-open
source. setting up metadata101.github.io/schemas GitHub pages still ties
it to a specific forge (GitHub).

For reference OGC provides http://schemas.opengis.net to host published
schemas.

Q: Is it appropriate to ask for osgeo hosting?

* osgeo.github.io/schemas - github pages, implicitly backed by a git
repository
* schemas.osgeo.org - web service, backed by git repostiory
* repo.osgeo.org/repository/schemas - setup a RAW repository to host files
(nota very good option)

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2594&gt;
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/&gt;
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.

#2594: vendor-neutral location for schemas
---------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: jive | Owner: sac@…
     Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Unplanned
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by jive):

Any preference or discussion to be had here? What is the next step ...

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2594#comment:1&gt;
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/&gt;
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.