#2678: old-adhoc planned shutdown
---------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: reopened
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-II
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment (by Jeff McKenna):
Replying to [comment:20 strk]:
> Ok so I removed the special handling of demo.mapserver.org/geocache AND
the entry for old.demo.mapserver.org
thanks
>
> Only left over nginx configurations pointing at old-adhoc is
oam.osgeo.org -- such service currently points at old-adhoc, does anyone
have an idea of who's in charge of managing it ?
I have never heard of that before.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2678#comment:21>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2678: old-adhoc planned shutdown
---------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: reopened
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-II
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment (by strk):
Well oam.osgeo.org is listed as "to be retired" in
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/AdhocVM so I'm going to remove that config as
well
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2678#comment:22>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2678: old-adhoc planned shutdown
---------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: reopened
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-II
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment (by Jeff McKenna):
Replying to [comment:20 strk]:
>
> Only left over nginx configurations pointing at old-adhoc is
oam.osgeo.org -- such service currently points at old-adhoc, does anyone
have an idea of who's in charge of managing it ?
See the oam.osgeo.org note at https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/AdhocVM
It was OpenArialMap, by Chris Schmidt, and can be removed, as noted there.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2678#comment:23>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2678: old-adhoc planned shutdown
---------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-II
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
---------------------------+----------------------------------------
Changes (by strk):
* status: reopened => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
Alright, oam.osgeo.org disabled and adhoc stopped again
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2678#comment:24>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2678: old-adhoc planned shutdown
---------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-II
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
---------------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment (by hamish):
For whatever it's worth, I had a GRASS demo running on adhoc as a cron job
(plotting daily global earthquakes from USGS data), but nothing depended
on it so no worries.
Hamish
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2678#comment:25>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2678: old-adhoc planned shutdown
---------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-II
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
---------------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment (by robe):
Hamish,
If you want to still keep that we can put in on a different container.
Let us know.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2678#comment:26>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.