#2735: osgeo-debian-11 LXD image on osgeo7 refers to a Debian 10 instead
---------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: strk | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-I
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+--------------------------------------
I've found today that the `osgeo-debian-11` image on osgeo7 (didn't check
other LXD hosts) is really pointing at a Debian 10 image. We should fix
that.
Dropping the alias/image could be enough for next deploy to recreate it.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2735>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2735: osgeo-debian-11 LXD image on osgeo7 refers to a Debian 10 instead
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: strk | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-I
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by strk):
osgeo9 also has the bogus alias, so maybe that's the origin of the
problem.
osgeo4, osgeo3 and osgeo8 don't have that alias.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2735#comment:1>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2735: osgeo-debian-11 LXD image on osgeo7 refers to a Debian 10 instead
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: strk | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-I
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by robe):
I think it's debian11 but it originated from a debian10 which I upgraded
to debian11.
I think for some reason when I copied over the image from osgeo9, it
reverted back to the description of the original image. Didn't look into
why that happened.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2735#comment:2>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2735: osgeo-debian-11 LXD image on osgeo7 refers to a Debian 10 instead
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: strk | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-I
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by strk):
Is there any reason why those images are not fresh debian11 ?
The reason why I thought they were debian10 was because of the /etc/issue
file stating it's a debian 10
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2735#comment:3>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2735: osgeo-debian-11 LXD image on osgeo7 refers to a Debian 10 instead
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: strk | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-I
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by robe):
No particular reason aside from I was too lazy to reset up ldap auth. I
think Alex said that would be a good role to have in ansible. Though the
setup I think it's slightly different between OS.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2735#comment:4>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2735: osgeo-debian-11 LXD image on osgeo7 refers to a Debian 10 instead
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: strk | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-I
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by strk):
I agree the ldap auth should be done with an ansible role, ansible can
handle OS differences
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2735#comment:5>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2735: osgeo-debian-11 LXD image on osgeo7 refers to a Debian 10 instead
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: strk | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-I
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by strk):
Another sign of the debian-11 image NOT being Debian-11 is this:
{{{
msg: No package matching 'python-is-python3' is available
}}}
That package is known to be available in Debian 11
The source.list file in a container created from `osgeo-debian-11` still
points at buster rather than bullseye
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2735#comment:6>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2735: osgeo-debian-11 LXD image on osgeo7 refers to a Debian 10 instead
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: strk | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-I
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by strk):
I'd drop the image and recreate it from plain upstream images:debian-11 if
you agree with this, we want the LDAP setup to be done with ansible anyway
- is there a documentation somewhere about how you enabled the LDAP auth
setup ?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2735#comment:7>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2735: osgeo-debian-11 LXD image on osgeo7 refers to a Debian 10 instead
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: strk | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-I
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by strk):
I've renamed the `osgeo-debian-11` image to `osgeo-debian-11-upgraded-
by-10-see-trac2735` and will continue from there, creating a new `osgeo-
debian-11` image being an updated upstream debian-11 image
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2735#comment:8>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2735: osgeo-debian-11 LXD image on osgeo7 refers to a Debian 10 instead
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: strk | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-I
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by strk):
It turns out it was ansible-deployment responsible for adding an `osgeo-
debian-11` alias while pointing at a `debian-10` image. I fixed that with
https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/sac/ansible-
deployment/commit/dfeb4fc3125218913088b1c96ba4a58088573384
Before closing this out I shall fix all other LXD hosts too
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2735#comment:9>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2735: osgeo-debian-11 LXD image on osgeo7 refers to a Debian 10 instead
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: strk | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-I
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Changes (by strk):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
osgeo9 also fixed, by a new deploy from ansible, after renaming the bogux
image to `osgeo-debian-11-bogus-see-trac2735` (those images, both on
osgeo9 and osgeo7, can be deleted now)
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2735#comment:10>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2735: osgeo-debian-11 LXD image on osgeo7 refers to a Debian 10 instead
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: strk | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-I
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by robe):
I rebuilt the osgeo-debian-11 using a fresh debian-11 and installing the
ldap osgeo stuff in. Script is here - https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/sac
/ansible-deployment/src/branch/master/deployment/roles/images/tasks/build-
osgeo-debian-11.yml
I'm rebuilding again to point the debian repo to debian.osuosl.org
I also still have to figure out how to put in a description on the images
with ansible to properly label it as having OSGeo LDAP pre-installed.
As part of the lxd host role for production hosts, I do have it copy over
the osgeo-debian-11 and osgeo-ubuntu-20 to the local host
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2735#comment:11>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#2735: osgeo-debian-11 LXD image on osgeo7 refers to a Debian 10 instead
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: strk | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone: Sysadmin Contract 2022-I
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
---------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by robe):
I was able to script addition of the description with below. A bit hacky
but it worked.
Basically it outputs the current image details with lxc image show and
then seds that to inject with OSGeo LDAP SSH and then pipe's the new yml
stuff with the new version using lxc image edit.
It's too bad there is no lxc add alias like thing for description.
{{{
- name: Add description to image
shell: >
lxc image show osgeo-debian-11 |
sed 's/Debian bullseye amd64/Debian bullseye amd64 with OSGeo LDAP
SSH /g' |
lxc image edit osgeo-debian-11
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2735#comment:12>
OSGeo <https://osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.