#985: Trac seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Is it just me or is trac for all the OSGeo sites really slow today. Takes
about 30 seconds or so for each page to load.
I tried PostGIS and OSGeo tracs.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#985: Trac seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by EliL):
Same here in Oregon. It took about 15-20 seconds just to login to make
this comment.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985#comment:1>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#985: Trac seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by warmerdam):
I'm also seeing this. The VM seems busy but not apparently bogged down.
I'm not sure what the bottle neck is. Anyone with skillz who can identify
the problem that would be helpful.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985#comment:2>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#985: Trac seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by warmerdam):
Arg, I meant to mention that I restarted apache and it didn't help all
that much.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985#comment:3>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#985: Trac seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by EliL):
Trac seems faster right now.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985#comment:4>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#985: Trac seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by neteler):
Trac is again very slow these days.
Maybe more RAM is needed for the VM?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985#comment:5>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#985: Trac seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by wildintellect):
Looking at the munin charts, I don't think that's the case. I am starting
to suspect threading in apache as the issue. Are we running the multi-
processor or the threaded Apache? (Look at the CPU and load, we have high
load but not all CPUs seem to be in use)
Are we still running mod_python? in that case perhaps just shifting to
mod_wsgi will get us increased performance.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985#comment:6>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#985: Trac seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by neteler):
* priority: normal => critical
Comment:
It is pretty unresponsive at time: Tue Aug 21 14:06:17 UTC 2012
The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985#comment:7>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#985: Trac seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by martin):
I think we need a specific, well-known test case because every time I look
at the machine there's just litte to moderate CPU load, almost no swapping
at all and moderate disk I/O.
markusN ?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985#comment:8>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#985: Trac seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by neteler):
Fine for test case if you tell me how..? BTW: Many people are affected,
not only me.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985#comment:9>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#985: Trac seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by neteler):
Here is one:
{{{
time -p svn ci -m"docs backport of trunk r52825 + older addition"
vector/v.in.ogr/description.html
Sending vector/v.in.ogr/description.html
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 52828.
real 200.67 <--- !
user 0.18
sys 0.03
}}}
Ping times during commit:
{{{
[neteler@north ]$ ping www.google.com
PING www.l.google.com (173.194.35.176) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from muc03s02-in-f16.1e100.net (173.194.35.176): icmp_req=1
ttl=53 time=39.3 ms
64 bytes from muc03s02-in-f16.1e100.net (173.194.35.176): icmp_req=2
ttl=52 time=43.3 ms
64 bytes from muc03s02-in-f16.1e100.net (173.194.35.176): icmp_req=3
ttl=52 time=41.9 ms
64 bytes from muc03s02-in-f16.1e100.net (173.194.35.176): icmp_req=4
ttl=52 time=41.8 ms
^C
--- www.l.google.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 7067ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.303/41.606/43.323/1.451 ms
[neteler@north ]$ ping trac.osgeo.org
PING trac.osgeo.org (140.211.15.71) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 140.211.15.71: icmp_req=1 ttl=50 time=201 ms
64 bytes from 140.211.15.71: icmp_req=2 ttl=50 time=203 ms
64 bytes from 140.211.15.71: icmp_req=3 ttl=50 time=212 ms
64 bytes from 140.211.15.71: icmp_req=4 ttl=50 time=202 ms
^C
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985#comment:10>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#985: Trac/svn seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985#comment:11>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#985: Trac/svn seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by robe):
Update -- trac speed seems more or less okay for me, but svn is very slow
to commit, though pull down is fast. Could it be some sort of svn hook
going on during commit?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985#comment:12>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#985: Trac/svn seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by dmorissette):
See ticket #1009 about the PostGIS commit hook
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985#comment:13>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#985: Trac/svn seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by neteler):
For the GRASS GIS project, I have commented out the ciabot entry in
/var/www/svn/repos/grass/hooks/post-commit
since CIA.vc is down anyway.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985#comment:14>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
#985: Trac/svn seems very slow today
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: sac@…
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: critical | Milestone:
Component: Systems Admin | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by neteler):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
Closing since the problem should be solved (commenting out CIA.vc
posthook).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/985#comment:15>
OSGeo <http://www.osgeo.org/>
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.