[SAC] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] mapguide download problem

(cc SAC)

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:06 AM, olek plewa <oolekp@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,
has anyone heard about downlaod problem of all mapguide OpenSource
staff, form the official website. I can not download anything form
about 3 days :confused:
Please do something

The download.osgeo.org server no more reachable from all providers
worldwide, apparently due to a routing problem. Here in Italy esp.
Telecom clients are affected, in other countries also other providers
(but never all).
The problem affects also the OSGeo4W project and others.

Markus

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 01:25:46PM +0100, Markus Neteler wrote:

The download.osgeo.org server no more reachable from all providers
worldwide, [...]

Works fine from here (Aachen, Germany) .... well, at least I'm getting
an SSH connect plus a PW prompt. Login doesn't work, but this might be
intentionally,

  Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@mgras.net> wrote:

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 01:25:46PM +0100, Markus Neteler wrote:

The download.osgeo.org server no more reachable from all providers
worldwide, [...]

Works fine from here (Aachen, Germany) .... well, at least I'm getting
an SSH connect plus a PW prompt. Login doesn't work, but this might be
intentionally,

Login is not involved, we speak about http access and such.

It affects the download and upload (and other machines) hosted at
telascience.org.

See
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/osgeo4w-dev/2011-March/001244.html
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/osgeo4w-dev/2011-March/001252.html

traceroute:
http://lists.gfoss.it/pipermail/gfoss/2011-March/017988.html

http://lists.gfoss.it/pipermail/gfoss/2011-March/018000.html
...

Some provider in Italy, Romania and elsewhere are affected for > 1 week.

Markus

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 01:54:51PM +0100, Markus Neteler wrote:

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@mgras.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 01:25:46PM +0100, Markus Neteler wrote:

>> The download.osgeo.org server no more reachable from all providers
>> worldwide, [...]
>
> Works fine from here (Aachen, Germany) .... well, at least I'm getting
> an SSH connect plus a PW prompt. Login doesn't work, but this might be
> intentionally,

Login is not involved, we speak about http access and such.

Yup, but routing affects HTTP in the same way as SSH :wink:
BTW, HTTP access works perfectly as well, from various places in
Germany. You're talking about 'download.osgeo.org' alias 198.202.74.218
alias 'marsctl0.sdsc.edu'. Right ?

Cheers,
  Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@mgras.net> wrote:

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 01:54:51PM +0100, Markus Neteler wrote:

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@mgras.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 01:25:46PM +0100, Markus Neteler wrote:

>> The download.osgeo.org server no more reachable from all providers
>> worldwide, [...]
>
> Works fine from here (Aachen, Germany) .... well, at least I'm getting
> an SSH connect plus a PW prompt. Login doesn't work, but this might be
> intentionally,

Login is not involved, we speak about http access and such.

Yup, but routing affects HTTP in the same way as SSH :wink:

Sure but the users who complain do not even know what ssh is...
For me it works but I am using a different provider.

BTW, HTTP access works perfectly as well, from various places in
Germany. You're talking about 'download.osgeo.org' alias 198.202.74.218
alias 'marsctl0.sdsc.edu'. Right ?

Yes.

Or not/also? I just got the TraceRoute output from the Polish user who posted
about mapguide:

66.223.95.245 is from United States(US) in region North America
TraceRoute to 66.223.95.245 [mapguide.osgeo.org]
Hop (ms) (ms) (ms) IP Address Host name
1 65 104 172 72.249.128.109 -
2 64 49 54 8.9.232.73
xe-5-3-0.edge3.dallas1.level3.net
3 21 14 16 4.69.145.62
vlan60.csw1.dallas1.level3.net
4 48 89 96 4.69.151.134
ae-63-63.ebr3.dallas1.level3.net
5 37 51 39 4.69.134.22
ae-7-7.ebr3.atlanta2.level3.net
6 113 105 56 4.69.148.254
ae-73-73.csw2.atlanta2.level3.net
7 60 57 98 4.69.150.67
ae-21-52.car1.atlanta1.level3.net
8 85 85 94 4.78.209.226
peer-1-netw.car1.atlanta1.level3.net
9 53 69 70 216.187.120.210 -
10 111 Timed out 74 64.224.0.101
atl2prddsrt03-vlan4.net.interland.net
11 Timed out Timed out Timed out -
12 Timed out Timed out Timed out -
13 Timed out Timed out Timed out -
14 Timed out Timed out Timed out -
Trace aborted.

A traceroute to "download" from Italy looks like this for Italian Telecom users:

Verso 198.202.74.218:
  1 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms router [192.168.2.1]
  2 50 ms 28 ms 28 ms 192.168.100.1
  3 29 ms 28 ms 29 ms 172.17.105.129
  4 30 ms 30 ms 28 ms 172.17.104.29
  5 35 ms 33 ms 33 ms 172.17.9.77
  6 56 ms 49 ms 35 ms 172.17.6.113
  7 * * * Richiesta scaduta.
  8 * * * Richiesta scaduta.

For me, also from Italy, different provider:
traceroute download.osgeo.org
traceroute to download.osgeo.org (198.202.74.218), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 10.0.100.254 (10.0.100.254) 0.250 ms 0.247 ms 0.271 ms
2 10.0.155.157 (10.0.155.157) 1.511 ms 1.509 ms 1.513 ms
3 77.72.194.185 (77.72.194.185) 2.159 ms 2.160 ms 2.153 ms
4 217.12.187.185 (217.12.187.185) 4.055 ms 4.050 ms 4.041 ms
5 62.196.10.161 (62.196.10.161) 5.987 ms 5.985 ms 6.005 ms
6 gi9-10.ccr01.mil01.atlas.cogentco.com (149.6.152.17) 7.776 ms
6.744 ms 7.145 ms
7 154.54.56.74 (154.54.56.74) 14.275 ms 14.271 ms 14.287 ms
8 te0-0-0-2.ccr21.fra03.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.0.73) 16.528 ms
16.200 ms 17.185 ms
9 te0-3-0-2.ccr21.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.39.177) 24.225
ms te0-1-0-2.ccr21.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.0.145) 24.220 ms
te0-4-0-2.ccr21.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.39.181) 24.195 ms
10 te0-2-0-2.ccr21.lpl01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.37.86) 34.356 ms
33.901 ms 34.211 ms
11 te0-4-0-4.ccr21.ymq02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.44.201) 103.913
ms te0-2-0-4.ccr21.ymq02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.70) 103.586 ms
te0-1-0-4.ccr21.ymq02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.26.141) 104.745 ms
12 te0-2-0-7.mpd22.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.42.225) 126.218
ms te0-3-0-1.mpd22.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.44.122) 127.381
ms te0-3-0-5.mpd22.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.43.217) 126.319
ms
13 te0-3-0-3.mpd21.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.161) 130.689
ms te0-0-0-6.mpd22.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.28.9) 125.716 ms
te0-3-0-3.mpd22.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.6.182) 124.545 ms
14 te0-1-0-2.mpd21.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.185) 142.133 ms
te0-3-0-1.mpd22.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.7.165) 135.977 ms
te0-3-0-1.mpd21.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.7.138) 136.712 ms
15 te0-3-0-3.mpd22.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.7.222) 175.895
ms te0-3-0-3.mpd21.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.102) 180.350 ms
te0-1-0-3.mpd21.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.210) 178.546 ms
16 te3-2.mpd01.sjc04.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.166) 184.010 ms
183.216 ms te4-2.mpd01.sjc04.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.28.82)
181.307 ms
17 * * *
18 dc-oak-core1--paix-px1-ge.cenic.net (137.164.47.19) 178.409 ms
178.394 ms 178.125 ms
19 dc-tri-core1--oak-core1-10ge-2.cenic.net (137.164.46.43) 180.223
ms * dc-tri-core1--oak-core1-10ge-2.cenic.net (137.164.46.43) 180.185
ms
20 dc-riv-core1--tri-core1-2.cenic.net (137.164.46.70) 180.535 ms
180.054 ms 179.619 ms
21 dc-sdg-agg1--riv-core1-10ge.cenic.net (137.164.47.110) 181.037 ms
dc-tri-core1--oak-core1-10ge-2.cenic.net (137.164.46.43) 178.810 ms
dc-sdg-agg1--riv-core1-10ge.cenic.net (137.164.47.110) 180.994 ms
22 dc-sdsc-2--sdg-agg1.cenic.net (137.164.23.134) 181.064 ms
180.807 ms 181.005 ms
23 thunder.sdsc.edu (132.249.31.5) 179.384 ms
dc-sdg-agg1--riv-core1-10ge.cenic.net (137.164.47.110) 180.484 ms
thunder.sdsc.edu (132.249.31.5) 179.916 ms
24 (198.202.74.218) 182.671 ms 182.386 ms 182.669 ms

... no problem for me. But for many others.

Maybe some bad DNS update partially propagated around?

Markus

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:15:29PM +0100, Markus Neteler wrote:

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@mgras.net> wrote:

> BTW, HTTP access works perfectly as well, from various places in
> Germany. You're talking about 'download.osgeo.org' alias 198.202.74.218
> alias 'marsctl0.sdsc.edu'. Right ?

Yes.

Or not/also? I just got the TraceRoute output from the Polish user who posted
about mapguide:

66.223.95.245 is from United States(US) in region North America
TraceRoute to 66.223.95.245 [mapguide.osgeo.org]

66.223.95.245 is 'osgeo1' :slight_smile:

Maybe some bad DNS update partially propagated around?

To me this sounds more like a route swap - which might already be
resolved for most users.

Cheers,
  Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------