[SAC] Request to transfer domain deegree.org to OSGeo

SAC, could you help Jens to transfer the deegree.org domain to OSGeo? (deegree is an OSGeo project so this request makes sense)

-jeff

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [Board] Request to transfer domain deegree.org to OSGeo
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:50:46 +0200
From: Jens Fitzke <fitzke@lat-lon.de>
To: board@lists.osgeo.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

_

Dear Board members,

In the mail cited below I described a problem we just had with deegree.org. In
the meantime it was possible, with the help of a professional lawyer, to
reject the prosecution. We removed everything from deegree.org which might
lead to the misinterpretation that commercial services are advertised there,
and we added an imprint, the latter as an interim solution to support the
rejection of the complaint.

As a long-term solution, as already pointed out below, I propose to transfer
the deegree.org domain to OSGeo. By that it would also from a legal point of
view be clear that it is a community domain, not a company domain. If that
transfer is possible, also the imprint could either be removed or adjusted to
the new situation.

Such a procedure could also be a solution for other OSGeo project who might
otherwise run into the same kind of trouble.

The question to you is, if such a transfer is possible, and what has to be
done to achieve it. Your feedback, please.

Kind regards,

Jens

- -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo is becoming irrelevant. Here's why. Let's
fix it.
Datum: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 09:57:18 +0200
Von: Jens Fitzke <fitzke@lat-lon.de>
Kopie (CC): discuss@lists.osgeo.org

Am 26.09.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Darrell Fuhriman:

This is a perfect example.

All of those are great and wonderful things! The community does great and
wonderful things. That’ s not my point.

My point is, those activities would happen even if the OSGeo Foundation
disappeared. I’m not questioning whether we have a large and vibrant
community, we do. And we still would.

My local chapter existed before it was an OSGeo chapter, and we would keep
on having meetings and doing fun and exciting things even without the
OSGeo Foundation.

Same is true for the German chapter. But nevertheless there is need for
something more umbrella-like.

Put another way: The OSGeo Foundation needs the Open Source Geospatial
community, but does the Open Source Geospatial community need the OSGeo
Foundation? I don’t see that it does.

Here's a case why the Open Source Geospatial community need the OSGeo
Foundation: Our company is currently being legally prosecuted as the owner of
the deegree.org domain. The claim is that on www.deegree.org there is a
commercial offering, but at the same time the web site lacks an imprint (which
is legally enforced in Germany for all commercial offerings). Besides the
question if some links to companies who provide "professional support" are
already a commercial offering, the main point here is, that lat/lon is made
responsible for something (providing the server) the company is only doing to
support the community. But the prosecutor is saying that lat/lon is
accountable here as per the whois entry.

We are currently evaluating reactions, together with a lawyer who is
experienced in legal aspects of Open Source. But as a more long-term solution
I'd say OSGeo should be the legal owner of deegree.org. From my naive legal
understanding this would help a lot to get things straight and more
transparent to the outside world.

This case might be a bit special, but it is a real one - and it might have
some larger impact as I am seeing other projects which have a similiar setting
and thus might run into the same kind of trouble. Depending on the legal
situation in the various countries, of course.

My 2 cents,

Jens

Hi SAC, I didn't see a response from anyone on this request. Can we begin a transfer of the deegree.org domain to OSGeo?

-jeff

On 2015-10-14 10:42 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:

SAC, could you help Jens to transfer the deegree.org domain to OSGeo?
(deegree is an OSGeo project so this request makes sense)

-jeff

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [Board] Request to transfer domain deegree.org to OSGeo
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:50:46 +0200
From: Jens Fitzke <fitzke@lat-lon.de>
To: board@lists.osgeo.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

_

Dear Board members,

In the mail cited below I described a problem we just had with
deegree.org. In
the meantime it was possible, with the help of a professional lawyer, to
reject the prosecution. We removed everything from deegree.org which might
lead to the misinterpretation that commercial services are advertised
there,
and we added an imprint, the latter as an interim solution to support the
rejection of the complaint.

As a long-term solution, as already pointed out below, I propose to
transfer
the deegree.org domain to OSGeo. By that it would also from a legal
point of
view be clear that it is a community domain, not a company domain. If that
transfer is possible, also the imprint could either be removed or
adjusted to
the new situation.

Such a procedure could also be a solution for other OSGeo project who might
otherwise run into the same kind of trouble.

The question to you is, if such a transfer is possible, and what has to be
done to achieve it. Your feedback, please.

Kind regards,

Jens

- -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo is becoming irrelevant. Here's why.
Let's
fix it.
Datum: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 09:57:18 +0200
Von: Jens Fitzke <fitzke@lat-lon.de>
Kopie (CC): discuss@lists.osgeo.org

Am 26.09.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Darrell Fuhriman:

This is a perfect example.

All of those are great and wonderful things! The community does great and
wonderful things. That’ s not my point.

My point is, those activities would happen even if the OSGeo Foundation
disappeared. I’m not questioning whether we have a large and vibrant
community, we do. And we still would.

My local chapter existed before it was an OSGeo chapter, and we would
keep
on having meetings and doing fun and exciting things even without the
OSGeo Foundation.

Same is true for the German chapter. But nevertheless there is need for
something more umbrella-like.

Put another way: The OSGeo Foundation needs the Open Source Geospatial
community, but does the Open Source Geospatial community need the OSGeo
Foundation? I don’t see that it does.

Here's a case why the Open Source Geospatial community need the OSGeo
Foundation: Our company is currently being legally prosecuted as the
owner of
the deegree.org domain. The claim is that on www.deegree.org there is a
commercial offering, but at the same time the web site lacks an imprint
(which
is legally enforced in Germany for all commercial offerings). Besides the
question if some links to companies who provide "professional support" are
already a commercial offering, the main point here is, that lat/lon is made
responsible for something (providing the server) the company is only
doing to
support the community. But the prosecutor is saying that lat/lon is
accountable here as per the whois entry.

We are currently evaluating reactions, together with a lawyer who is
experienced in legal aspects of Open Source. But as a more long-term
solution
I'd say OSGeo should be the legal owner of deegree.org. From my naive legal
understanding this would help a lot to get things straight and more
transparent to the outside world.

This case might be a bit special, but it is a real one - and it might have
some larger impact as I am seeing other projects which have a similiar
setting
and thus might run into the same kind of trouble. Depending on the legal
situation in the various countries, of course.

My 2 cents,

Jens

Yes, we can help with this. Please file a ticket. I suspect it will be
easier to coordinate with someone also in the EU on the transfer timing.

Anyone recall if the transfer is initiated on the current service or
pairnic 1st?

I suspect at minimum we need to know what IP to point the url to, Jens
should also join the SAC list (which is a general requirement for people
running servers we point to).

Thanks,
Alex

On 10/19/2015 06:12 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:

Hi SAC, I didn't see a response from anyone on this request. Can we
begin a transfer of the deegree.org domain to OSGeo?

-jeff

On 2015-10-14 10:42 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:

SAC, could you help Jens to transfer the deegree.org domain to OSGeo?
(deegree is an OSGeo project so this request makes sense)

-jeff

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [Board] Request to transfer domain deegree.org to OSGeo
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:50:46 +0200
From: Jens Fitzke <fitzke@lat-lon.de>
To: board@lists.osgeo.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

_

Dear Board members,

In the mail cited below I described a problem we just had with
deegree.org. In
the meantime it was possible, with the help of a professional lawyer, to
reject the prosecution. We removed everything from deegree.org which
might
lead to the misinterpretation that commercial services are advertised
there,
and we added an imprint, the latter as an interim solution to support the
rejection of the complaint.

As a long-term solution, as already pointed out below, I propose to
transfer
the deegree.org domain to OSGeo. By that it would also from a legal
point of
view be clear that it is a community domain, not a company domain. If
that
transfer is possible, also the imprint could either be removed or
adjusted to
the new situation.

Such a procedure could also be a solution for other OSGeo project who
might
otherwise run into the same kind of trouble.

The question to you is, if such a transfer is possible, and what has
to be
done to achieve it. Your feedback, please.

Kind regards,

Jens

- -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo is becoming irrelevant. Here's why.
Let's
fix it.
Datum: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 09:57:18 +0200
Von: Jens Fitzke <fitzke@lat-lon.de>
Kopie (CC): discuss@lists.osgeo.org

Am 26.09.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Darrell Fuhriman:

This is a perfect example.

All of those are great and wonderful things! The community does great
and
wonderful things. That’ s not my point.

My point is, those activities would happen even if the OSGeo Foundation
disappeared. I’m not questioning whether we have a large and vibrant
community, we do. And we still would.

My local chapter existed before it was an OSGeo chapter, and we would
keep
on having meetings and doing fun and exciting things even without the
OSGeo Foundation.

Same is true for the German chapter. But nevertheless there is need for
something more umbrella-like.

Put another way: The OSGeo Foundation needs the Open Source Geospatial
community, but does the Open Source Geospatial community need the OSGeo
Foundation? I don’t see that it does.

Here's a case why the Open Source Geospatial community need the OSGeo
Foundation: Our company is currently being legally prosecuted as the
owner of
the deegree.org domain. The claim is that on www.deegree.org there is a
commercial offering, but at the same time the web site lacks an imprint
(which
is legally enforced in Germany for all commercial offerings). Besides the
question if some links to companies who provide "professional support"
are
already a commercial offering, the main point here is, that lat/lon is
made
responsible for something (providing the server) the company is only
doing to
support the community. But the prosecutor is saying that lat/lon is
accountable here as per the whois entry.

We are currently evaluating reactions, together with a lawyer who is
experienced in legal aspects of Open Source. But as a more long-term
solution
I'd say OSGeo should be the legal owner of deegree.org. From my naive
legal
understanding this would help a lot to get things straight and more
transparent to the outside world.

This case might be a bit special, but it is a real one - and it might
have
some larger impact as I am seeing other projects which have a similiar
setting
and thus might run into the same kind of trouble. Depending on the legal
situation in the various countries, of course.

My 2 cents,

Jens

_______________________________________________
Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:51:56AM -0700, Alex Mandel wrote:

Yes, we can help with this. Please file a ticket. I suspect it will be
easier to coordinate with someone also in the EU on the transfer timing.

Of course I can help with this, I was just waiting for those who were
familiar with domain transfers to pairNIC to speak up.

I suspect at minimum we need to know what IP to point the url to,

No, the IP's are secondary, the formal procedure is what needs to be
finished before. The last time I did this (many years ago) the domain
owner had to request a transfer (authentication) code from his
registrar to be submitted to the new registrar for the transfer, but I
was told the process is more automated these days.

Cheers,
  Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 10/19/2015 08:16 AM, Martin Spott wrote:

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:51:56AM -0700, Alex Mandel wrote:

Yes, we can help with this. Please file a ticket. I suspect it will be
easier to coordinate with someone also in the EU on the transfer timing.

Of course I can help with this, I was just waiting for those who were
familiar with domain transfers to pairNIC to speak up.

I suspect at minimum we need to know what IP to point the url to,

No, the IP's are secondary, the formal procedure is what needs to be
finished before. The last time I did this (many years ago) the domain
owner had to request a transfer (authentication) code from his
registrar to be submitted to the new registrar for the transfer, but I
was told the process is more automated these days.

Cheers,
  Martin.

Here are the instructions (crazy url)
https://www.pairnic.com/index.m?0000001284438905^��Z�U��%2C���֠h6c�T���dv"4%40����5��{�%20\]��w�%2BIZvը>��'��6�� ���>����K i�

I can help with anything on the Pairnic side. Looks like transfer should
be initiated on the current registrar.

If you need an email dnscontact@osgeo.org works

Thanks,
Alex

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 20.10.2015 um 03:11 schrieb Alex Mandel:

Here are the instructions (crazy url)
https://www.pairnic.com/index.m?0000001284438905^��Z�U��%2C��%

F0%D6%A0h6c%CAT%B8%DF%E6dv%22%104%40%D0%1B%97%AF%BA5%94%BB%7B%7F%EE%20%5C%1B%5D%
C6%CCw%BD%2BIZv%D5%A8%3E%ED%FD%00%27%B7%D66%F3%BB%0A%F5%CC%C8%3E%DE%16%CE%E3%1F%
8FK%13%01%0Ai%B9

I can help with anything on the Pairnic side. Looks like transfer should
be initiated on the current registrar.

If you need an email dnscontact@osgeo.org works

Sounds good.

I'll initiate the transfer and let you know.

Thank you,

Jens
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlYl14sACgkQIaYc4TLqzo+ABQCcCJSbdtY7e8gmX5nKsd4MdM5t
Ry8AoK1qBHbTxoG8QdztdKv9VMck+F+e
=bgJO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

_

Hi,

As a first step we could change the contact data for the deegree domains -
currently these are deegree.de, deegree.net and deegree.org. To simplify
things, I'd suggest to let deegree.de and deegree.net expire (by 07/20/2017)
and only keep deegree.org.

Thus, for the following contacts the data should be changed to OSGeo. To do
so, I guess I need the contact handle ID. Can you help here?

As a next step we could then transfer the domain.

We could also do it the other way around, but I was advised to do it this way.
If it is easier for your part to first transfer and then change contacts, this
is also fine with me. I'd then have to figure out, how to do (I guess I have
to set a domain password and send to you...).

Thanks,

Jens

Am 20.10.2015 um 07:56 schrieb Jens Fitzke:

Am 20.10.2015 um 03:11 schrieb Alex Mandel:

Here are the instructions (crazy url)
https://www.pairnic.com/index.m?0000001284438905^��Z�U��%2C��

%

F0%D6%A0h6c%CAT%B8%DF%E6dv%22%104%40%D0%1B%97%AF%BA5%94%BB%7B%7F%EE%20%5C%1B%5D%

C6%CCw%BD%2BIZv%D5%A8%3E%ED%FD%00%27%B7%D66%F3%BB%0A%F5%CC%C8%3E%DE%16%CE%E3%1

F%

8FK%13%01%0Ai%B9

I can help with anything on the Pairnic side. Looks like transfer should
be initiated on the current registrar.

If you need an email dnscontact@osgeo.org works

Sounds good.

I'll initiate the transfer and let you know.

Thank you,

Jens _______________________________________________ Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlY3j2cACgkQIaYc4TLqzo89bgCfR6SPNOP4qmofKCOUzltz+cjV
a/EAn3XgCQfsaAcOSUtBeVHWU6UREoE6
=u9ec
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Tach Jens,

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 05:29:27PM +0100, Jens Fitzke wrote:

Thus, for the following contacts the data should be changed to OSGeo. To do
so, I guess I need the contact handle ID. Can you help here?

As a next step we could then transfer the domain.

We could also do it the other way around, but I was advised to do it this way.
If it is easier for your part to first transfer and then change contacts, this
is also fine with me. I'd then have to figure out, how to do (I guess I have
to set a domain password and send to you...).

I never changed any contact data for OSGeo domains, therefore I can't
tell how difficult this would be at pairNIC. Alex, Jeff ?

In order to get the domain transferred, we need the so called "auth
code" (or "authcode"). Please request this auth code from your domain
provider, do *not* disclose it to anyone else and send it *encrypted*
to one of us.

Cheers,
  Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 11/02/2015 08:58 AM, Martin Spott wrote:

Tach Jens,

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 05:29:27PM +0100, Jens Fitzke wrote:

Thus, for the following contacts the data should be changed to OSGeo. To do
so, I guess I need the contact handle ID. Can you help here?

As a next step we could then transfer the domain.

We could also do it the other way around, but I was advised to do it this way.
If it is easier for your part to first transfer and then change contacts, this
is also fine with me. I'd then have to figure out, how to do (I guess I have
to set a domain password and send to you...).

I never changed any contact data for OSGeo domains, therefore I can't
tell how difficult this would be at pairNIC. Alex, Jeff ?

Super easy, I just updated the info for all our domains a couple of
weeks ago.

In order to get the domain transferred, we need the so called "auth
code" (or "authcode"). Please request this auth code from your domain
provider, do *not* disclose it to anyone else and send it *encrypted*
to one of us.

Cheers,
  Martin.

Yes that would be the way to do it, get the transfer code and get it to
one of us in a secret way, you could even do it over the phone with
Martin perhaps?

-Alex

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 06:41:16PM -0800, Alex Mandel wrote:

Yes that would be the way to do it, get the transfer code and get it to
one of us in a secret way, you could even do it over the phone with
Martin perhaps?

Sure,

  Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 03.11.2015 um 08:00 schrieb Martin Spott:

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 06:41:16PM -0800, Alex Mandel wrote:

Yes that would be the way to do it, get the transfer code and get it to
one of us in a secret way, you could even do it over the phone with
Martin perhaps?

Sure,

Martin.

The Domain passwort for deegree.org has been sent to Martin by encrypted email.

If this works out well, we could initiate the transfer of deegree.de and
deegree.net in the same way.

Jens
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlY4dNcACgkQIaYc4TLqzo9rAwCgjMJLd6Espae8S51w31uxYt6v
b2wAoKEBpKqvAT3cb/ADqEkDpQFP3x1J
=eSte
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

The auth code worked as expected:

"The transfer of the following domain name has been successfully initiated:

    deegree.org

You're not done! We'll be sending further instructions to the current Administrative Contact."

.... which means the transfer must be approved.

Cheers,
  Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 03.11.2015 um 10:28 schrieb Martin Spott:

The auth code worked as expected:

"The transfer of the following domain name has been successfully
initiated:

deegree.org

You're not done! We'll be sending further instructions to the current
Administrative Contact."

.... which means the transfer must be approved.

Cheers, Martin.

Thanks, Martin.

This seem to work out well. I confirmed the transfer at pairNIC and
subsequently I agreed to the transfer at the current domain register.

Please let me know, when the transfer is completed. Meanwhile I'll figure out
what we'll do about deegree.net and deegree.de.

Kind regards,

Jens
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlY4jCEACgkQIaYc4TLqzo/SxQCfdcCpnx+m9PcQUESp2EFhmUU6
4FoAnioWr+82JNtN2v4HtMrJHHTYqIPi
=kuOM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:27:45AM +0100, Jens Fitzke wrote:

This seem to work out well. I confirmed the transfer at pairNIC and
subsequently I agreed to the transfer at the current domain register.

Please let me know, when the transfer is completed.

The FAQ says:

"Wait Six Days - After the administrative contact approves the transfer
to pairNIC, no further action is required. The transfer will
automatically complete after six days. You will be notified by your
current registrar if there is any reason the transfer is refused."

Cheers,
  Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------