I've done the same upgrade remotely before, nothing
much to report..
Martin S wrote:
I'm already in preparation of such upgrade for
the Wiki VM and given the fact that these VM's
are running a regular distro kernel I don't
expect any major trouble.
I'm happy to take on the adhoc VM as a guinea pig.
AFAIK the only issue there may be the custom
installed sphinx. The new debian ships a slightly
newer version of that that so I think it is mostly
a question of dealing with any left over cruft.
I've done the same upgrade remotely before, nothing
much to report..
Same here on one of my own servers, just wanted to be
sure for the virtual machines.
Martin S wrote:
I'm already in preparation of such upgrade for
the Wiki VM and given the fact that these VM's
are running a regular distro kernel I don't
expect any major trouble.
I'm happy to take on the adhoc VM as a guinea pig.
AFAIK the only issue there may be the custom
installed sphinx. The new debian ships a slightly
newer version of that that so I think it is mostly
a question of dealing with any left over cruft.
OK, so I would suggest to do
- first wiki VM and adhoc
- then projects VM
- then the rest (lists is still to be migrated)
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:34:03AM +0100, Markus Neteler wrote:
OK, so I would suggest to do
- first wiki VM and adhoc
Ok, herewith I'm announcing approx. 30 minutes of planned downtime for
the Wiki this Sunday afternoon (for those who are 'feeling' UTC time).
I can't predict when exactly this will be but will post a short
announcement before downtime starts.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:25:53PM +0100, Martin Spott wrote:
Ok, herewith I'm announcing approx. 30 minutes of planned downtime for
the Wiki this Sunday afternoon (for those who are 'feeling' UTC time).
I can't predict when exactly this will be but will post a short
announcement before downtime starts.
Voila,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 07:24:53PM +0100, Markus Neteler wrote:
Try this:
Heh, I already did a couple of dist-upgrades to Squeeze, including some
without access to the console, therefore I'm slightly confident that I
know what I'm looking at
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:12:12PM -0800, Hamish wrote:
e.g. have a peek at "4.5. Possible issues during upgrade"
and "5.2. LDAP support"
Without looking at this document I know that LDAP support in Squeeze is
a lot more mature than in any Debian release before. I was used to
maintain PAM auth files by hand, but this isn't necessary any more with
Squeeze.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
