Just got an email from Dell, confirming our server order shipped today.
Estimated delivery date: 02/22/2010 !!
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 01:04:21PM -0800, Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) wrote:
Estimated delivery date: 02/22/2010 !!
Oh my, a lot of work ahead .... 
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Spott wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 01:04:21PM -0800, Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) wrote:
Estimated delivery date: 02/22/2010 !!
Oh my, a lot of work ahead ....
Martin.
According to Fedex they have now been delivered. Anyone have a
preference which server we setup immediately versus which one will come
online in a few weeks?
Choices:
OSGeo3 - Raid5 ~700GB
OSGeo4 - Raid6 1.2+TB
I'll probably also need a list of SAC members/email addresses for those
who should be given direct logins to the Host machines - I assume Frank
or Howard will furnish that to me. Remember that's just to control the
creating and management of the virtual machines and to rescue LDAP. Each
vm itself will have LDAP like all the current machines.
Thanks,
Alex
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:26:01AM -0800, Alex Mandel wrote:
According to Fedex they have now been delivered. Anyone have a
preference which server we setup immediately versus which one will come
online in a few weeks?
Hmmm, didn't I already do so ?
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alex Mandel wrote:
I'll probably also need a list of SAC members/email addresses for those
who should be given direct logins to the Host machines - I assume Frank
or Howard will furnish that to me. Remember that's just to control the
creating and management of the virtual machines and to rescue LDAP. Each
vm itself will have LDAP like all the current machines.
Alex,
The list of Primary Administrators has the people is applicable.
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/SAC:Primary_Administrators
I do believe their should be at least one VM without LDAP based
administration - that being the one which host LDAP itself and
perhaps some other services for which security is of the utmost
importance.
It is also possible/likely that we will want to establish additional
LDAP groups for those with shell access for particular VMs. The current
shell access group is quite large and might not be suitable for machines
we want administered carefully.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam@pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent