Is it me or does the "What's the acronym of this organization"
captcha broken ? I keep trying to solve it but never succeed.
Isn't it "OSGeo" or "osgeo" ?
I'm much more lucky with the dog or the logo color 
--strk;
Hi,
Markus set the captchas up when we had this sever spam problems recently, it is part of the ConfirmEdit extension.
I would be fine with disabling the captcha, now that we have the reviewed account creation.
@Markus: What is your opinion on this?
Cheers,
Christian
Am 15.04.2016 um 10:04 schrieb Sandro Santilli:
Is it me or does the "What's the acronym of this organization"
captcha broken ? I keep trying to solve it but never succeed.Isn't it "OSGeo" or "osgeo" ?
I'm much more lucky with the dog or the logo color
--strk;
_______________________________________________
Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac
On Apr 15, 2016 11:04 AM, “Christian Willmes” <mail@cwillmes.de> wrote:
Hi,
Markus set the captchas up when we had this sever spam problems recently, it is part of the ConfirmEdit extension.
I would be fine with disabling the captcha, now that we have the reviewed account creation.@Markus: What is your opinion on this?
If there is no spam hell then… Let’s try.
Markus
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 01:06:36PM +0200, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Apr 15, 2016 11:04 AM, "Christian Willmes" <mail@cwillmes.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Markus set the captchas up when we had this sever spam problems recently,
it is part of the ConfirmEdit extension.
> I would be fine with disabling the captcha, now that we have the reviewed
account creation.
>
> @Markus: What is your opinion on this?If there is no spam hell then... Let's try.
I just needed to know what the solution to the "acronym" captcha was,
it doesn't seem a big deal to keep it IMHO (even if it isn't clear
to me when is the captcha needed as often the "wrong captcha" message
appear on submitting an editing operation from a form with no
captcha).
--strk;
On Apr 15, 2016 2:21 PM, “Sandro Santilli” <strk@keybit.net> wrote:
I just needed to know what the solution to the “acronym” captcha was,
You can see it in the settings file of the wiki. I’m on the road and cannot check.
Markus
–strk;
Sac mailing list
Sac@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 02:47:56PM +0200, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Apr 15, 2016 2:21 PM, "Sandro Santilli" <strk@keybit.net> wrote:
> I just needed to know what the solution to the "acronym" captcha was,You can see it in the settings file of the wiki. I'm on the road and cannot
check.
A-ha, sounds like one of those files that would be great to have
in a private git repository
Christian, want to try that out ?
You could create such private repository under the "sac" organization
in the experimental Gogs deploy:
sac - OSGeo Git Services: Gitea - Git with a cup of tea
Maybe "wiki-config"...
--strk;
If others, who edit the file regularly, like Martin or Markus, are ok with it, I would not mind.
But for me it is ok like it is now.
I like the Gogs service... though, I am used to GitLab we (our lab) use for our private repositories.
I think of moving the SMW models [1] to Gogs. Is this now "official" OSGeo supported infrastructure and will remain under this URL etc.?
Christian
[1] https://github.com/cwillmes/OSGeoWiki
Am 15.04.2016 um 15:13 schrieb Sandro Santilli:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 03:01:38PM +0200, Christian Willmes wrote:
hmmm, having the configuration file including DB passwords etc. in a
git repository sounds not very appealing to me.Is this usual practice?
As long as you keep your repository private, why not ?
Granted you might not trust the Gogs service in particular,
but putting the configs within a local repository is no
problem per-se.The Gogs service configuration (including admin password)
is in a private, Gogs-served, repository:https://git.osgeo.org/_gogs_/sac/gogs-config
--strk;
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 03:34:38PM +0200, Christian Willmes wrote:
I think of moving the SMW models [1] to Gogs. Is this now "official"
OSGeo supported infrastructure and will remain under this URL etc.?
It is not official.
I guess it'll move to another URL if it ever becomes more used, but then
the old URLs should still work by redirect.
--strk;