Seeking Guidance: Fix Works on My End but Not for Reviewer

I recently worked on fixing issue on grass markdown-to-man conversion script and submitted a PR. When I tested it manually using the same input file, the output seemed correct on my end. However, Reviewer reviewed it and found that it still doesn’t work properly.

Since we are using the same input file, I’m trying to understand what might be causing this difference. Could there be any factors I might be overlooking? I’d really appreciate any suggestions on how to align my testing to ensure the fix works correctly for everyone.

Thank you in advance for your guidance!

here is the pr link: Improve table handling and formatting in markdown-to-man conversion by Sachin-NK · Pull Request #4 · petrasovaa/grass · GitHub

my output :


reviewer’s output :

Your screenshot looks like the source code of the man page, you need to view it with man outputfile

This is not the best place to discuss this, the original PR would be best or grass developer forum.

Thank you for the guidance! :blush: I appreciate the clarification, and I’ll continue the discussion in the appropriate place. Apologies for any inconvenience! :pray: