I've removed sac@lists.osgeo.org from being cc'd on all trac.osgeo.org/osgeo
emails.
I also changed the cc all to go to sac-tickets@discourse.osgeo.org.
So all future tickets should go here -
If you still want to be notified about these, then watch that category.
I discovered why the reason it didn't work before when Vicky and I were
trying to get discourse to receive these directly, is because of the trac
settings
use_public_cc = disabled
Which caused trac to set the to address to undisclosed-recipients -- Thanks
strk for figuring that out.
Once I changed that to enabled, the to address started showing in the
discourse email logs and it was able to properly put them in the right
category.
I'm still trying to figure out why some of the responses I sent went into
the SAC mailing list - OSGeo (if it was
just continuing the thread or was looking at the owner of the ticket, some
of which were still set to sac@lists.osgeo.org). I'm pretty sure the one
that went in sac-list, was one I had changed the owner to, so I suspect it
is prioritizing mail thread over the to/cc address.
I started moving all the sac ticket emails into the sac-tickets category to
reduce the clutter so that sac-lists will be purely true SAC dialogue.
I would like to very soon move the SAC mailing list to discourse (so it's
not just a mirror), but I'll start up a separate topic for that.
This is great, thanks for setting it up.Jorge ---- On dv.,05 de gen. 2024 03:55:00 +0100 lr@pcorp.us wrote ----I've removed sac@lists.osgeo.org from being cc'd on all trac.osgeo.org/osgeo
emails.
I also changed the cc all to go to sac-tickets@discourse.osgeo.org.
So all future tickets should go here -
If you still want to be notified about these, then watch that category.
I discovered why the reason it didn't work before when Vicky and I were
trying to get discourse to receive these directly, is because of the trac
settings
use_public_cc = disabled
Which caused trac to set the to address to undisclosed-recipients -- Thanks
strk for figuring that out.
Once I changed that to enabled, the to address started showing in the
discourse email logs and it was able to properly put them in the right
category.
I'm still trying to figure out why some of the responses I sent went into
the SAC mailing list - OSGeo (if it was
just continuing the thread or was looking at the owner of the ticket, some
of which were still set to sac@lists.osgeo.org). I'm pretty sure the one
that went in sac-list, was one I had changed the owner to, so I suspect it
is prioritizing mail thread over the to/cc address.
I started moving all the sac ticket emails into the sac-tickets category to
reduce the clutter so that sac-lists will be purely true SAC dialogue.
I would like to very soon move the SAC mailing list to discourse (so it's
not just a mirror), but I'll start up a separate topic for that.
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 10:55:06PM -0500, Regina Obe wrote:
I've removed sac@lists.osgeo.org from being cc'd on all trac.osgeo.org/osgeo
emails.
I also changed the cc all to go to sac-tickets@discourse.osgeo.org.
If you still want to be notified about these, then watch that category.
How do I "watch" a category ?
By "be notified" you meant "receve an email" ?
That's what I'd like to happen, which is what I just lost (I think,
if I don't take action).
I discovered why the reason it didn't work before when Vicky and I were
trying to get discourse to receive these directly, is because of the trac
settings
use_public_cc = disabled
Which caused trac to set the to address to undisclosed-recipients -- Thanks
strk for figuring that out.
Please remember to commit that change on the local git repository,
with a link to this mail on the archive (Mailman or Discourse or
both), and possibly with your name as Author. I hope we can soon have
trac also deployed via Ansible so this will be simpler to track.
I started moving all the sac ticket emails into the sac-tickets category to
reduce the clutter so that sac-lists will be purely true SAC dialogue.