[GRASS-dev] grass 7.2 planning

mlennert · October 24, 2016, 6:51am

On 23/10/16 23:25, Martin Landa wrote:

Hi,

2016-10-22 15:53 GMT+02:00 Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org>:

+1 for 7.2.0RC1 in the next days. Any objections, comments? Ma

no objections, +1 for 7.2.0RC1...

+1

Moritz

neteler · October 26, 2016, 10:39pm

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Moritz Lennert
<mlennert@club.worldonline.be> wrote:

On 23/10/16 23:25, Martin Landa wrote:

Hi,

2016-10-22 15:53 GMT+02:00 Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org>:

+1 for 7.2.0RC1 in the next days. Any objections, comments? Ma

no objections, +1 for 7.2.0RC1...

+1

As time permits, I'll try to package RC1 tomorrow (err, today), so on 27th Oct.

Markus

martinl · October 27, 2016, 5:57am

Hi Markus,

2016-10-27 0:39 GMT+02:00 Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org>:

As time permits, I'll try to package RC1 tomorrow (err, today), so on 27th Oct.

Thanks! Ma

--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa

Markus_Metz · October 28, 2016, 9:10pm

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Moritz Lennert
<mlennert@club.worldonline.be> wrote:

On 23/10/16 23:25, Martin Landa wrote:

Hi,

2016-10-22 15:53 GMT+02:00 Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org>:

+1 for 7.2.0RC1 in the next days. Any objections, comments? Ma

no objections, +1 for 7.2.0RC1...

+1

As time permits, I'll try to package RC1 tomorrow (err, today), so on 27th Oct.

I have fixed a memory leak in the rasterlib trunk r69751, related to
the new null file compressing, which needs to be backported to relbr72
before final release. Since RC1 is not out yet, should I backport now?
The new null file compression and new compressors for (f)cell files
are new features in G72, by some regarded as quite important new
features, so more testing by those interested in the new compression
methods is most welcome.

There are more memory leaks in lib/raster/open.c and
lib/raster/close.c, but these are minor. However, they should be fixed
at some stage.

Markus M

Markus
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

martinl · October 28, 2016, 9:35pm

Hi,

2016-10-28 23:10 GMT+02:00 Markus Metz <markus.metz.giswork@gmail.com>:

before final release. Since RC1 is not out yet, should I backport now?

well RC1 is already out [1]. But please backport, it will be part of RC2.

Thanks, Ma

[1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Release/7.2.0-News#ReleaseCandidate1RC1

--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa

Markus_Metz · October 28, 2016, 10:05pm

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

2016-10-28 23:10 GMT+02:00 Markus Metz <markus.metz.giswork@gmail.com>:

before final release. Since RC1 is not out yet, should I backport now?

well RC1 is already out [1]. But please backport, it will be part of RC2.

Apparently I missed the announcement in the mailing lists and the note
on grass.osgeo.org.

Backported to relbr72 with r69753.

Markus M

Thanks, Ma

[1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Release/7.2.0-News#ReleaseCandidate1RC1

--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa

neteler · October 29, 2016, 7:53am

On Oct 29, 2016 12:05 AM, “Markus Metz” <markus.metz.giswork@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

2016-10-28 23:10 GMT+02:00 Markus Metz <markus.metz.giswork@gmail.com>:

before final release. Since RC1 is not out yet, should I backport now?

well RC1 is already out [1]. But please backport, it will be part of RC2.

Apparently I missed the announcement in the mailing lists and the note
on grass.osgeo.org.

I’ll post it as soon as some binary packages are ready.

Backported to relbr72 with r69753.

Thanks.

markusN

Markus M

Thanks, Ma

[1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Release/7.2.0-News#ReleaseCandidate1RC1

–
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa

mlennert · October 29, 2016, 8:02am

Le 29 octobre 2016 09:53:21 GMT+02:00, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> a écrit :

On Oct 29, 2016 12:05 AM, "Markus Metz" <markus.metz.giswork@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Martin Landa

<landa.martin@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> 2016-10-28 23:10 GMT+02:00 Markus Metz

<markus.metz.giswork@gmail.com>:

>> before final release. Since RC1 is not out yet, should I backport

now?

>
> well RC1 is already out [1]. But please backport, it will be part

of
RC2.

Apparently I missed the announcement in the mailing lists and the

note

on grass.osgeo.org.

I'll post it as soon as some binary packages are ready.

As some of the release planning threads span over long periods of time, I understand that some developers don't follow them. Maybe we could add a step to the release procedure in the form of a separate mail a few days before releasing an RC. Something with a title like "Heads up: RC* will be released in X days" ?

Moritz

Backported to relbr72 with r69753.

Thanks.

markusN

Markus M

>
> Thanks, Ma
>
> [1]

https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Release/7.2.0-News#ReleaseCandidate1RC1

>
> --
> Martin Landa
> http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
> http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa

sebastic · October 29, 2016, 8:03am

On 10/29/2016 09:53 AM, Markus Neteler wrote:

On Oct 29, 2016 12:05 AM, "Markus Metz" wrote:

Apparently I missed the announcement in the mailing lists and the note
on grass.osgeo.org.

I'll post it as soon as some binary packages are ready.

At least the Debian packages are already available (in Debian
experimental & ubuntugis-experimental).

Kind Regards,

Bas

--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

neteler · October 29, 2016, 8:33am

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Moritz Lennert
<mlennert@club.worldonline.be> wrote:

Le 29 octobre 2016 09:53:21 GMT+02:00, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> a écrit :

I'll post it as soon as some binary packages are ready.

As some of the release planning threads span over long periods of time, I understand that some developers don't follow them. Maybe we could add a step to the release procedure in the form of a separate mail a few days before releasing an RC. Something with a title like "Heads up: RC* will be released in X days" ?

In the past years I was always notifying the packagers an instance
after a RC went online.
Some packagers complained to me to please be less intensively notified
so I reduced it to the final release notifications only since many of
them would not package RCs anyway.

Perhaps we need to split the group of packagers up into
- packagers being interested in all notifications
- packagers being only interested in final release notifications.

Side issue: quite regularly some last minute issues delays the RC
(just check the past 5 years ... so X days is hard to define.

My 0.02 cents
markusN

martinl · October 29, 2016, 10:43am

Hi,

2016-10-29 10:33 GMT+02:00 Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org>:

Perhaps we need to split the group of packagers up into
- packagers being interested in all notifications
- packagers being only interested in final release notifications.

make sense to. Anyway please put in into the first group

The GRASS 7.2.0RC1 wingrass packages (standalone + osgeo4w in testing
area) + ubuntugis packages in experimental PPA are available. Ma

--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa

neteler · October 29, 2016, 4:42pm

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:

I'll post it as soon as some binary packages are ready.

Done:
https://grass.osgeo.org/news/64/15/GRASS-GIS-7-2-0RC1-released

(screenshot donated by Vaclav)

markusN